Partenaires

CNRS IN2P3 CNRS


Rechercher

Sur ce site

Sur le Web du CNRS


Accueil du site > ANGLAIS > Research > Exotic Nuclei > Research topics > Experiments > GANIL (Caen) > Observation of two protons in the decay of 45Fe with a TPC (E457a) - 2005


Observation of two protons in the decay of 45Fe with a TPC (E457a) - 2005

Date: september 2006

Collaboration

* CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan (France)
* GANIL Caen (France)
* NIPNE Bucarest (Romania)
* DAPNIA Saclay (France)

 

Abstract

The decay of the ground-state two-proton emitter 45Fe was studied with a time-projection chamber and the emission of two protons was unambiguously identified. The total decay energy and the half-life measured in this work agree with the results from previous experiments. The present result constitutes the first direct observation of the individual protons in the two-proton decay of a long-lived ground-state emitter. In parallel, we identified for the first time directly two-proton emission from 43Cr, a known \beta-delayed two-proton emitter. The technique developed in the present work opens the way to a detailed study of the mechanism of ground-state as well as \beta-delayed two-proton radioactivity.

 

Introduction

For the most proton-rich nuclei with an even number of protons, Goldanskii [1] predicted the occurance of a new nuclear decay mode, which he termed two-proton (2p) radioactivity. He suggested that, at the proton drip line and due to the pairing of protons, nuclei exist which are bound with respect to one-proton emission but unbound to two-proton emission. It is interesting that the list of possible 2p emitters proposed by Goldanskii contained already 45Fe, for which ground-state two-proton radioactivity was indeed discovered [2,3] only recently.

However, these experiments did not allow to observe the two protons directly. For this purpose, we constructed a time projection chamber (TPC), which enabled us to visualise the traces of the two protons in three dimensions. This information should allow to determine the decay pattern and distinguish between different schematic picture like the three-body decay or a 2He emission pattern (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Schematic presentation of uncorrelated three-body decay and 2He emission, both rather handy but also unrealistic pictures of two-proton emission.

 

Experimental setup: the TPC

The 45Fe nuclei were produced at the SISSI-ALPHA-LISE3 facility of GANIL. A primary 58Ni26+ beam with an energy of 75 MeV/nucleon and an average intensity of 3 \muA was fragmented in a natNi target (200\mum) in the SISSI device. The fragments of interest were selected by a magnetic-rigidity, energy-loss, and velocity analysis by means of the ALPHA spectrometer and the LISE3 separator including an energy degrader (500\mum of beryllium) in the LISE3 dispersive focal plane and transported to the LISE3 final focal plane [4].

Figure 2: Schematic representation of the time-projection chamber developed at the CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan. The nuclei of interest traverse first two silicon detectors (one standard detector with a thickness of 150$\mu$m and a second position-sensitive detector (150\mum) with resistive read-out) and are then implanted in the active volume of a gas-filled chamber, where they decay by emission of charged particles. The charge cloud created by the energy loss of either the heavy ions or the decay products drifts in the electric field of the chamber towards a set of four gas electron multipliers (GEMs, not shown), where the charges are multiplied. The electric potential finally directs the charges onto a two-dimensional detection plane, where two orthogonal sets of 768 strips (pitch of 200\mum) allow a measurement of the charges deposited on each strip. Every second strip is equipped with an ASIC readout yielding signal height and time stamp. The other half of the strips is connected in groups of 64 strips to standard preamplifiers and shapers.

 

Results

In the focal plane they were implanted in the TPC [5] (see Figure 2), where their trajectories can be visualised in 3 dimensions. Figure 3 presents an implantation event in X and Y which allows to locate the stopping position of the implanted 45Fe. By means of a fit this position is determined. The 2p emission has to start at the same position.

Figure 3: An implantation event is fitted in X and Y to determine in implantation position, which is assumed to be the starting point for the subsequent decay.

 

Figure 4 shows a few of the 45Fe events as registered with the TPC during the 2005 experiment after treatment in the analysis.

Figure 4: The figure shows three events of 2p emission from 45Fe. The signal collected by the different X and Y strips is shown as a function of the strip number. The upper part exhibits the X strips, whereas the lower part shows the signals for the Y direction of the TPC. For each event the two protons are nicely visible.

 

From this analysis, we can then determine the 2D projection of the 2p events (Figure 5). The third dimension which is determined from the time projection of the events is presently being analysed.

Figure 5: 2D representation of three two-proton emission events as reconstructed from the TPC signals.

 

Finally, from the determination of the path length and the integrated signal for each individual proton, the energy of each proton can be determined. This is hown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Energy sharing between the two protons.

 

Conclusion

The present experiment allowed to visualise for the first time in three dimensions the two protons emitted in two-proton radioactivity of 45Fe. From the data, we have established the equal energy sharing of the two protons and we will determine the emission angle between the two protons. Similar data have been obtained also in a MSU experiment [6].

References

[1] V.I. Goldanskii, Nucl. Phys. 19, 482 (1960).
[2] J. Giovinazzo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 102501 (2002).
[3] M. Pf\"utzner et al., Eur. Phys. J. A14, 279 (2002).
[4] J. Giovinazzo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 102501 (2007).
[5] B. Blank et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B266, 4606 (2008).
[6] K. Miernik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 192501 (2007).